A stronger euro, tariff fears and ETF buying edged gold to new highs once again in March.
Looking forward
Fiscal and monetary support may be receding, and the timing isn’t great for risk assets given current turmoil. Fundamentals remain solid for gold.
Strong euro and tariff fears drive gold
Another month, another set of new highs. Gold finished March at US$3,115/oz, a gain of 9.9% m/m.1 Even a materially weaker US dollar, primarily via euro strength, couldn’t prevent a stellar performance and new highs across all other major currencies (Table 1).
According to our Gold Return Attribution Model (GRAM), euro strength and thus US dollar weakness was once again a key driver of gold’s performance, alongside an increase in geopolitical risk capturing tariff fears (Chart 1). Gold ETF buying continued apace in March with all regions contributing. US funds led the charge with US$6bn (67t) of net inflows followed by Europe then Asia with approximately US$1bn each. While ETF flows were positive, COMEX futures declined marginally by US$400mn (5t) likely on profit taking.
Chart 1: A materially weaker dollar and tariff fears drove gold to new highs in March
Key drivers of gold’s return by month*
Chart 1: A materially weaker dollar and tariff fears helped propel gold price higher in March
Chart 1: A materially weaker dollar and tariff fears helped propel gold price higher in March
Key drivers of gold’s return by month*
*Data to 31 March 2025. Our Gold Return Attribution Model (GRAM) is a multiple regression model of monthly gold price returns, which we group into four key thematic driver categories of gold’s performance: economic expansion, risk & uncertainty, opportunity cost, and momentum. These themes capture motives behind gold demand; most importantly, investment demand, which is considered the marginal driver of gold price returns in the short run. ‘Unexplained’ represents the percentage change in the gold price that is not explained by factors already included. Results shown here are based on analysis covering an estimation period from February 2007 to February 2025.
Source: Bloomberg, World Gold Council
Sources:
Bloomberg,
World Gold Council; Disclaimer
*Data to 31 March 2025. Our Gold Return Attribution Model (GRAM) is a multiple regression model of monthly gold price returns, which we group into four key thematic driver categories of gold’s performance: economic expansion, risk & uncertainty, opportunity cost, and momentum. These themes capture motives behind gold demand; most importantly, investment demand, which is considered the marginal driver of gold price returns in the short run. ‘Unexplained’ represents the percentage change in the gold price that is not explained by factors already included. Results shown here are based on analysis covering an estimation period from February 2007 to February 2025.
Table 1: Gold hit new highs during March
Gold price and performance in key currencies*
USD (oz)
EUR (oz)
JPY (g)
GBP (oz)
CAD (oz)
CHF (oz)
INR (10g)
RMB (g)
TRY (oz)
AUD (oz)
March price*
3,115
2,881
15,013
2,413
4,478
2,755
88,691
728
118,256
4,991
March return*
9.9%
5.5%
9.4%
7.1%
9.3%
7.6%
4.6%
8.4%
14.4%
9.3%
Y-t-d return*
19.4%
14.3%
13.7%
15.8%
19.3%
16.3%
16.8%
18.2%
28.2%
18.3%
Record high price*
3,115
2,881
15,013
2,413
4,478
2,755
88,691
728
118,256
4,991
Record high date*
31-Mar 2025
31-Mar 2025
31-Mar 2025
31-Mar 2025
31-Mar 2025
31-Mar 2025
28-Mar 2025
31-Mar 2025
31-Mar 2025
31-Mar 2025
Source: Bloomberg, World Gold Council *As of 31 March 2025. Based on the LBMA Gold Price PM in USD, expressed in local currencies, except for India and China where the MCX Gold Price PM and Shanghai Gold Benchmark PM are used, respectively.
When the wells run dry
Liquidity matters, and has arguably been bolstering both financial assets and the economy in the US for much of the post-COVID period
In 2022, however, US financial conditions tightened forcefully as liquidity was removed from markets. This perfect storm caused a very rare annual joint decline in bonds and equities. Gold held up but also experienced some bumps along the way
We are now at a similar impasse in liquidity conditions, but with crucial differences that bode well fundamentally for gold
The one hurdle is the hitherto strong run-up in gold prices. Comparisons to the 2011 and 2020 peaks are likely to be made, but in our view, the environment remains supportive of further gains.
US…aid
While by no means the sole contributors to their solid performance, the US economy and financial markets benefited from monetary and fiscal support since the COVID pandemic.
Fiscal spending programmes arguably bolstered job creation via government and government-adjacent jobs (Chart 2). Capital markets were also aided by fiscal liquidity provisions combined with a continuation of the ‘monetary backstop’ from the Fed. This helped compress the Treasury bond risk premium to well below its pre-COVID average and equity multiples to well above their pre-COVID averages (Chart 3).
Chart 2: Employment growth mostly in public sector
Cumulative change in US non-farm payrolls by sector*
Chart 2: Employment growth mostly in public sector
Chart 2: Employment growth mostly in public sector
Cumulative change in US non-farm payrolls by sector
Data as of March 2025. Government adjacent: healthcare and education,
Source: Bloomberg, World Gold Council
Sources:
Bloomberg,
World Gold Council; Disclaimer
*Data as of March 2025. Government adjacent: healthcare and education.2
Chart 3: Fiscal boost and monetary backstop has helped assets
US 10-year Treasury risk premia and S&P 500 P/E ratio*
Chart 3: Fiscal boost and monetary backstop has helped assets
Chart 3: Fiscal boost and monetary backstop has helped assets
US 10-year Treasury risk premia and S&P 500 P/E ratio
Data as of March 2025.
Source: Bloomberg, World Gold Council
Sources:
Bloomberg,
World Gold Council; Disclaimer
*Data as of March 2025.
These sources of liquidity ebbed in 2022, coinciding with a rare joint decline in bond and equity markets (a 60/40 blend of S&P 500 and US treasuries dropped as well as economic activity). Gold also succumbed, falling 20% over two quarters in 2022, before a recovery to end the year flat. Proving direct causality is difficult, yet it does suggest markets and the economy had grown accustomed to artificial support.
At a crossroads
While much of the conversation over the past week has centred around tariffs, liquidity risk remains an important undercurrent. And we believe we may now be approaching a similar impasse to what markets experienced in 2022.
Quantitative tightening is slowing but there has been no mention of a resumption of quantitative easing. Indeed, the appetite might not be there given the high levels of debt and sticky inflation. In addition, constraints on government spending via the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) are stifling fiscal support. And the Fed’s Overnight Reverse Repo facility (ON RRP) is low, which provides less wiggle room for the Fed to manage liquidity issues. This appears to be showing up in stats like order-book liquidity for equity futures and – as flagged in the Fed’s financial stability report in November3 – on-the-run bond liquidity. It may also be contributing to the year-to-date equity rout.
Chart 4: Liquidity punchbowl has been important for asset and economy
Federal reserve assets, Treasury General Account funds, Reverse Repo facility assets, equity-bond portfolio performance*
Chart 4: Liquidity punchbowl has been important for asset and economy
Chart 4: Liquidity punchbowl has been important for asset and economy
Federal reserve assets, Treasury General Account ass
*Data as of March 2025. All values in US$mn. 60/40 equity-bond portfolio comprises 60% MSCI USA TR and 40% Bloomberg US Treasury Total Return index, indexed to 5,000 for visibility.
Source: Bloomberg, World Gold Council
Sources:
Bloomberg,
World Gold Council; Disclaimer
*Data as of March 2025. All values in US$mn. 60/40 equity-bond portfolio comprises 60% MSCI USA TR and 40% Bloomberg US Treasury Total Return index, indexed to 5,000 for visibility.
And the labour market is flirting with contraction as hours worked are in steep decline. Logically they lead an employment slowdown as companies reduce hours for staff before layoffs; statistically this also appears to be the case.4 But layoffs are also now on the rise and are likely to feed into payroll numbers in due course (Chart 5). To add to this, uncertainty surrounding tariffs has supercharged concerns about the resiliency of labour markets in the short and medium term.
Chart 5: Payrolls flirting with their first negative print
Hours worked and non-farm payrolls employment*
Chart 5: Payrolls flirting with their first negative print
Chart 5: Payrolls flirting with their first negative print
Hours worked and non-farm payrolls employment*
*Data from January 2011 to February 2025. Granger causality analysis run on data from March 2006 to February 2025. See footnote 3.
Source: Macrobond, World Gold Council
Sources:
Macrobond,
World Gold Council; Disclaimer
*Data from January 2011 to February 2025. Granger causality analysis run on data from March 2006 to February 2025. See footnote 3.
Similar but different
Should we see a similar drying up of liquidity, it’s likely to be different to 2022.
While inflation was rising more in 2022, it was driven by growth. This time around inflation is sticky while growth is faltering, resulting in a stagflationary environment. In this context, rates are unlikely to be going up from here and further weakening of the dollar is likely on waning US exceptionalism
Central banks have been strong contributors to gold’s performance over the past three years and show few signs of letting up, adding fundamental support to prices
US gold ETF investors had built up sizeable holdings in 2020 prior to the 2022 wobbles. But they have been sidelined until recently, suggesting capacity to keep adding.
Fundamentals remain in place…
The current run-up in price has taken many by surprise. Paraphrasing an old adage, shouldn’t high prices for a commodity cure high prices? Gold is not a commodity in the traditional sense and primary production’s response may have only limited impact on price. The willingness to hold and reluctance to sell – given current extreme policy uncertainty – could generate real momentum. By historical standards, the current rally isn’t particularly large or long. And comparing the current rally to the recent 2011 and 2020 peaks highlights that, relatively speaking, fundamentals look more solid (Table 2):
Table 2: Gold fundamentals in better shape
Gold US ETF Scorecard
USD (oz)
EUR (oz)
JPY (g)
Metrics
2011
2020
2025
US Gold ETF % of US ETFs
7.2
2.1
1.6
US 10-year TIPs yield
0.1
-1.0
1.8
Tips yield 12m later
-0.7
-1.2
–
S&P 500 forward P/E
12.2
25.7
20.9
Forward P/E 12m later
13.6
22.0
–
US HY spread to 10-year Tsy
6.3
4.8
3.5
HY to 10Y Tsy spread 12m later
5.2
2.7
–
Citi broad REER dollar
78.0
98.3
109.7
REER dollar 12m later
81.6
95.2
–
Source: Bloomberg, World Gold Council *Data referenced to 31 August 2011, 30 June 2020 and 31 March 2025. HY=High yield. REER= Real Effective Exchange Rate.
US gold ETFs are a considerably smaller share of all US ETF assets than during 2011 as ETF buyers have been on the sidelines for the best part of four years they are not overbought
Real yields are higher and above their long-run average, suggesting more downside than upside risk for yields – and vice versa for gold prices
Forward equity price-to-earnings remains high, and that provides capacity for further downside to equities should an economic slowdown and earnings downgrades worsen, especially in the current geoeconomic conditions, a boon for gold’s safe-haven appeal
Credit spreads are considerably tighter than during the two previous peaks. Again, widening risks trump contraction risk, and are also gold supportive.
The dollar remains elevated relative to prior periods even if it has weakened since the start of the year. With the Trump administration favouring a weaker dollar and the uncertain effect of tariffs, this could serve as an additional tailwind for gold.
…But not without risks
But we also caution that there are risks for the gold price after a rally such as this in such a short space of time.
Treasury managers at central banks could prudently slow their pace of buying given the price rally, as we saw with some central banks last year. While consumer demand adapts to higher prices eventually, the speed of price moves is like to dampen net buying in the near term. A liquidity-crunch could negatively affect gold as the most liquid assets are sold to meet margin calls.5 Additionally, geopolitical and policy nervousness is quite elevated, particularly given significant uncertainty about tariffs and its effect on market volatility, which is likely adding a meaningful premium to gold prices. Any resolution could bring that premium out as we have seen in previous historical periods.
Chart 6: The current rally is impressive but has yet to surpass even 2011 and 2020
Gold price, trough-to-peak rally returns and their durations*
Chart 6: The current rally is impressive but has yet to surpass even 2011 and 2020
Chart 6: The current rally is impressive but has yet to surpass even 2011 and 2020
As of
Source: Bloomberg, World Gold Council
Sources:
Bloomberg,
World Gold Council; Disclaimer
*Data as of 31 March 2025. Peaks and troughs selected using Argrelextrema algorithm in Python.
In sum..
The extent and speed of gold’s rally has drawn out comparisons to previous peaks. While there are headwinds that the gold market will naturally face in this environment, our analysis also suggest that current macroeconomic conditions are quite different to prior periods when the gold market reached previous highs.
Footnotes
1Based on the LBMA Gold Price PM as of 31 March 2025. Gold recorded an all-time high of US$2,936.85/oz on 19 February 2025.
4Engle Granger causality test shows a statistically significant lead relationship between hours worked and non-farm payrolls between lags of 1 to 4 months (p-values less than 5%) but not the other way around. Dummy used in 2020 to capture COVID anomalies.
Diversification does not guarantee any investment returns and does not eliminate the risk of loss. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. The resulting performance of any investment outcomes that can be generated through allocation to gold are hypothetical in nature, may not reflect actual investment results and are not guarantees of future results. The World Gold Council and its affiliates do not guarantee or warranty any calculations and models used in any hypothetical portfolios or any outcomes resulting from any such use. Investors should discuss their individual circumstances with their appropriate investment professionals before making any decision regarding any Services or investments.
This information may contain forward-looking statements, such as statements which use the words “believes”, “expects”, “may”, or “suggests”, or similar terminology, which are based on current expectations and are subject to change. Forward-looking statements involve a number of risks and uncertainties. There can be no assurance that any forward-looking statements will be achieved. World Gold Council and its affiliates assume no responsibility for updating any forward-looking statements.
Information regarding QaurumSM and the Gold Valuation Framework
Note that the resulting performance of various investment outcomes that can be generated through use of Qaurum, the Gold Valuation Framework and other information are hypothetical in nature, may not reflect actual investment results and are not guarantees of future results. Neither World Gold Council (including its affiliates) nor Oxford Economics provides any warranty or guarantee regarding the functionality of the tool, including without limitation any projections, estimates or calculations.